R&D Initiatives

icon picker

During 2021 the Cognitive Security & Education Forum (COGSEC) produced multiple research outputs, included in our 2021 edited volume “Narrative Information Ecosystems: Conflict and Trust on the Endless Frontier” (download link below). This 2021 volume reflects work related to the 2021 COGSEC initiative “Narrative Information Management” (NIM, see the original call for collaborators below). During 2022, COGSEC continued this initiative by integrating its research interests and objectives under an expanded scope through the being conducted by the University of Washington Applied Physics Lab’s Information Risk and Synthetic Intelligence Research Initiative (IRSIRI). IRSIRI, as a part of its participation in the US National Science Foundation (NSF) Convergence Accelerator, hosted an experimental, crowd-sourced research program which frames the global information environment as a market for information in need of exchange protocols and local standards setting in order to de-risk, reduce volatility, and increase trust in digital information transactions. The program aimed to create the conceptual foundation for an exchange-house, or verified information exchange environment (VIE), which would increase trust in digital information exchanges through the use of an eclectic ensemble of information sharing, curation, and research tools.
This continuation of NIM, in conjunction with our 2022 CAT-22 initiative, resulted in another volume as well, “Structuring the Information Commons: Open Standards and Cognitive Security”, , which included a republishing of certain relevant articles from our 2021 volume.
3.6 MB

Original 2021 Call for Collaborators

Researchers, scientists, and concerned citizens are increasingly recognizing the sociological and national security dangers associated with being exposed to an overwhelming volume of dissonant information, contributing to an increasingly hostile public discourse, reduced efficacy in research production, and a general decline in social cohesion and institutional trust. The average American spends 11 hours per day interacting with electronic media, viewing thousands of content objects and between four and ten thousand targeted advertisements, many of which are disguised as informative content. More than half of Americans consume this content on applications that were designed for the optimization of dwell-time and advertising revenue rather than the curation and compression of news and information. A well meaning individual of average or better intelligence, for example, searching the internet for information to develop an opinion on COVID-19 related topics will find an endless stream of potentially relevant and contradicting information from both valid sources and those which present troublingly false content and unfounded assertions. With 6,000 scientific articles being published daily and inadequate tools for aggregation and distinction, scientists and researchers are also being affected by these circumstances. This situation has been dubbed an “Infodemic” by the World Health Organization.
When the brain cannot reduce the complexity of the environment, it reduces the complexity of the strategy it uses to make sense of it. 20 years of well-reproduced research on “Cognitive Load” and “Sensemaking”, the process by which intelligent systems produce meaning to facilitate action, suggests that when an individual is exposed to potentially relevant, contradicting information at a rate inconsistent with the time and effort required to integrate and does not have access to appropriate tools, a trusted network of experts, or domain-specific training, they may withdraw from their role in the environment or experience anxiety and reduction in ability to manage stress, set priorities, make decisions, and detect logical inconsistency. To circumvent the stress of “cognitive overload”, the brain uses strategies such as:
compressing and filtering with an inappropriate emphasis on and abstraction of threat detection, resulting in paranoia and vulnerability to conspiracy theories
maintaining continuous partial attention, preventing integration of information and maintenance of focus,
or compressing and filtering on a basis of narrative identity, resulting in tribalism and vulnerability to extremist ideology and cults of personality.
At best, these strategies create the potential for redundant analysis, wasted time, reduced work performance, and “role withdrawal” or apathy, at worst, they contribute to a false-sense of knowing and vulnerability to narrative warfare and social engineering, contributing to a free-fall in the institutional trust required to maintain social cohesion.
Sensemaking is becoming dysfunctional, tribal, siloed, and vulnerable to threat actors and opportunists. Contemporary research on knowledge management suggests that there are measurable dimensions of an information environment that affect the cognitive load of its users and that the environment can be improved across these dimensions with modern techniques, data standards, and affordances. However, these techniques are not yet developed enough to inform reliably effective interventions or to inform the architecture of the standards, therefore related affordances are not yet present in tools in common usage. In the interest of U.S. election and national security as well as international stability, interventions have been recommended in order to develop and deploy new tools and programs for facilitating the development and stewardship of a more trustworthy, interoperable, and accessible information environment.
“It is not satisfactory to simply say that all those who do evil acts are evil. It has a beginning, nearly always with believing falsities and absurdities.” - Garry Kasparov
To this end, COGSEC’s 2021 research initiatives will be centered around “Narrative Information Management”, how we track, detect, develop, compress, and store information about narrative and memetic content. It will focus on exploring the domains of intelligence analysis, commercial intelligence, and sensemaking in a team and project context, building on the research developed from COGSEC’s 2020 research initiative on remote team performance. The goal will be to consider the insights found in the exploration of these and other relevant domains to work toward the development of tools that help individuals and teams compress and manage information.
We are actively seeking collaborators in topics related to:
Information Chain-of-Custody
Blockchain for Chain of Custody of Information and Governance
Bibliometrics and Reference Data Management
Data standardization: Geospatial, Physiological, Education/Competency Data
Memes & Online Culture
Large-scale Natural Language Processing
Argument and Narrative Mapping
Platform and User experience design
Organizational Sense-making
Cybernetics and AI Facilitation
Knowledge Management Systems
Organizational Psychology, especially where it relates to Rapidly Assembled Remote Teams
Gamification and Incentivisation of Heuristic Discovery and Consensus
Narrative and Memetic Warfare
Gray-zone and Peer-adversary Persuasion Campaign Detection and Deterrence
Given our focus on interdisciplinary research, please do not hesitate to respond to calls for collaboration if you are interested in these topics or contributing to solutions but are not specialized in the mentioned domains.


Authorship or other forms of contribution under a COGSEC program does not necessarily represent or constitute (i) an endorsement of any other hosted materials, (ii) a formal affiliation with any associated organizations or communities or COGSEC itself, or (iii) contact or association with any other contributor or author, even where they are marked as contributors or authors on the same materials.

Want to print your doc?
This is not the way.
Try clicking the ⋯ next to your doc name or using a keyboard shortcut (
) instead.